Another example of how centralization of authority has done so much good – NOT.
Can anyone refute the idea made here that the definition of marriage being challenged? Is it not true that people really are being held equal before the law but that people are actually arguing that the law is unfair? That the definition of marriage is unfair or that its recognition of that definition is unfair?
Just how is it a natural right to force others or the government to acknowledge your homosexual relationship as ‘marriage’? What right is that? Aren’t rights more about freedoms to act as opposed to freedoms to enjoy others sanction for your acts?